There are no items in your cart
Add More
Add More
Item Details | Price |
---|
A crucial Public Accounts Committee (PAC) meeting was adjourned after Madhabi Puri Buch, the chairperson of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), failed to appear before the committee. The absence of SEBI's head sparked complaints from BJP members, who have taken the matter up with Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. This development has raised concerns about accountability and communication between regulatory bodies and parliamentary committees.
Reason for the Meeting
The PAC meeting was expected to address important issues concerning SEBI’s oversight and regulatory actions. The PAC, a parliamentary body responsible for scrutinizing government expenditures, often calls upon various heads of regulatory institutions to answer questions and provide clarifications on financial matters. SEBI, being India’s primary market regulator, plays a key role in maintaining transparency and accountability in financial markets.
BJP Members’ Complaints
Following Madhabi Buch's absence, BJP members expressed their dissatisfaction, alleging that SEBI's failure to attend the meeting hampers the committee's ability to conduct its responsibilities effectively. They escalated the issue by complaining to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, calling for stricter adherence to parliamentary protocols. Their grievances highlight concerns over SEBI’s accountability in responding to parliamentary oversight.
Meeting Postponed
Due to SEBI chairperson’s non-appearance, the PAC meeting has been postponed until further notice. It remains unclear whether the meeting will be rescheduled promptly or if new measures will be introduced to ensure SEBI’s participation in future sessions.
Conclusion
The postponement of the PAC meeting due to Madhabi Buch’s absence has brought attention to the relationship between regulatory bodies and parliamentary committees. As SEBI faces growing scrutiny, it is crucial for its leadership to engage fully with the PAC and other governmental bodies to maintain transparency and trust in India’s financial system. The developments surrounding this incident are likely to have further implications on regulatory oversight in the coming weeks.